a. Which criteria did you use to evaluate Stomp.com? Why did you choose this criteria? What lessons have you learnt from this activity?
I used coverage to evaluate stomp.com.sg. Stomp’s news cover happenings and sights all over Singapore. They mostly first hand experiences from the Stompers, some were interesting news they seen on the net or in the newspapers. Stomp's news cannot be seen and heard from the tv news and newspapers and this gives Singaporeans a platform to express what they feel or what they saw. Stomp's website has mane segments for different types of news, organising the news neat and well. So usability is one of the criteria I used to evaluate Stomp too. It's website is full of information yet neat and organised. I have learnt that evaluating a website cannot be evaluated as a whole but it needs to be evaluated but the criteria taught to us. So that it is more detailed and relevant.
b. How do you feel about sharing your views via Wiki?
I feel that sharing views on the net is very interactive among other users. Not only you can feel how others view about the topic. Our knowledge expands as we read other comments and information. Because there are many things that we might not know, and would only know if information is shared around. Wiki is good because information can be edited by anyone. Information can be corrected and information are all gathered in a place.
No comments:
Post a Comment